 |
| Research article summary (published 29 Apr 2009): |
Quantification of five neuropsychological approaches to defining mild cognitive impairment.
Full Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Operational definitions of cognitive impairment have varied widely in diagnosing mild cognitive impairment (MCI). Identifying clinical subtypes of MCI has further challenged diagnostic approaches because varying the components of the objective cognitive assessment can significantly impact diagnosis. Therefore, the authors investigated the applicability of diagnostic criteria for clinical subtypes of MCI in a naturalistic research sample of community elders and quantified the variability in diagnostic outcomes that results from modifying the neuropsychological definition of objective cognitive impairment. DESIGN: Cross-sectional and longitudinal study. SETTING: San Diego, CA, Veterans Administration Hospital. PARTICIPANTS: Ninety nondemented, neurologically normal, community-dwelling older adults were initially assessed and 73 were seen for follow-up approximately 17 months later. MEASUREMENTS: Participants were classified via consensus diagnosis as either normally aging or having MCI via each of the five diagnostic strategies, which varied the cutoff for objective impairment and the number of neuropsychological tests considered in the diagnostic process. RESULTS: A range of differences in the percentages identified as MCI versus cognitively normal were demonstrated, ranging from 10-74%, depending on the classification criteria used. A substantial minority of individuals demonstrated diagnostic instability over time and across diagnostic approaches. The single domain nonamnestic subtype diagnosis was particularly unstable (e.g., prone to reclassification as normal at follow up). CONCLUSION: Our findings provide empirical support for a neuropsychologically derived operational definition of clinical subtypes of MCI and point to the importance of using comprehensive neuropsychological assessments. Diagnoses, particularly involving nonamnestic MCI, were variable over time. The applicability and utility of this particular MCI subtype warrants further investigation.
Author information
Author/s: Jak, Amy J (AJ); Bondi, Mark W (MW); Delano-Wood, Lisa (L); Wierenga, Christina (C); Corey-Bloom, Jody (J); Salmon, David P (DP); Delis, Dean C (DC);
Affiliation: VA San Diego Healthcare System, San Diego, CA 92161, USA. ajak(-atsign-)ucsd.edu
Grants: K24 AG26431 (Agency:NIA NIH HHS) ; P50 AG05131 (Agency:NIA NIH HHS) ; R01 AG12674 (Agency:NIA NIH HHS)
Journal and publication information
Publication Type: Journal Article; Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't; Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S.
Journal: The American journal of geriatric psychiatry : official journal of the American Association for Geriatric Psychiatry (Am J Geriatr Psychiatry), published in United States. (Language: eng)
Reference: 2009-May; vol 17 (issue 5) : pp 368-75
Dates: Created 2009/04/24; Completed 2009/06/09; Revised 2009/09/15;
PMID: 19390294, status: MEDLINE (last retrieval date: 9/16/2009, IMS Date: 16 Sep 2009 00:00:00)
Sourced from the National Library of Medicine. Abstract text and other information may be subject to copyright.
External Links for this article
(including full text providers, if available):
Click Electronic Full-text Provider Links to see options for finding the electronic full text links to this article. Note there may be a subscription or fee required for access to the full text. See our FAQ for information on finding FREE full text articles.
This article may also be located in paper journal collections available in many libraries. Use the Journal and Publication Information above to find the full article.
MeSH headings (categories)
This article was linked to the MESH Headings shown below.
Related articles
This article has not been indexed for related articles as yet, however you can still use the live related article search links below.
See a large map of 100+ related articles.