|
|
| Research article summary (published 13 Aug 2009): |
A comparison of several approaches for choosing between working correlation structures in generalized estimating equation analysis of longitudinal binary data.
Full Abstract
The method of generalized estimating equations (GEE) models the association between the repeated observations on a subject with a patterned correlation matrix. Correct specification of the underlying structure is a potentially beneficial goal, in terms of improving efficiency and enhancing scientific understanding. We consider two sets of criteria that have previously been suggested, respectively, for selecting an appropriate working correlation structure, and for ruling out a particular structure(s), in the GEE analysis of longitudinal studies with binary outcomes. The first selection criterion chooses the structure for which the model-based and the sandwich-based estimator of the covariance matrix of the regression parameter estimator are closest, while the second selection criterion chooses the structure that minimizes the weighted error sum of squares. The rule out criterion deselects structures for which the estimated correlation parameter violates standard constraints for binary data that depend on the marginal means. In addition, we remove structures from consideration if their estimated parameter values yield an estimated correlation structure that is not positive definite. We investigate the performance of the two sets of criteria using both simulated and real data, in the context of a longitudinal trial that compares two treatments for major depressive episode. Practical recommendations are also given on using these criteria to aid in the efficient selection of a working correlation structure in GEE analysis of longitudinal binary data. Copyright 2009 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Author information
Author/s: Shults, Justine (J); Sun, Wenguang (W); Tu, Xin (X); Kim, Hanjoo (H); Amsterdam, Jay (J); Hilbe, Joseph M (JM); Ten-Have, Thomas (T);
Affiliation: Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Center for Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA 19034, USA. jshults(-atsign-)mail.med.upenn.edu
Journal and publication information
Publication Type: Comparative Study; Journal Article; Randomized Controlled Trial; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Journal: Statistics in medicine (Stat Med), published in England. (Language: eng)
Reference: 2009-Aug; vol 28 (issue 18) : pp 2338-55
Dates: Created 2009/07/14; Completed 2009/10/01;
PMID: 19472307, status: MEDLINE (last retrieval date: 10/1/2009, IMS Date: )
Sourced from the National Library of Medicine. Abstract text and other information may be subject to copyright.
External Links for this article
(including full text providers, if available):
Click Electronic Full-text Provider Links to see options for finding the electronic full text links to this article. Note there may be a subscription or fee required for access to the full text. See our FAQ for information on finding FREE full text articles.
This article may also be located in paper journal collections available in many libraries. Use the Journal and Publication Information above to find the full article.
MeSH headings (categories)
This article was linked to the MESH Headings shown below.
Related articles
These are the highest related articles currently in the database:
- The review by Weinmann and colleagues.
26 May 2008 - Duloxetine and venlafaxine-XR in the treatment of major depressive disorder: a meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials.
25 Sep 2005 - Meta-analysis of placebo rates in major depressive disorder trials.
29 Nov 2003 - Mixtures of varying coefficient models for longitudinal data with discrete or continuous nonignorable dropout.
29 Nov 2004 - Joint analysis of longitudinal data with informative right censoring.
7 Apr 2007 - Strengthening clinical effectiveness trials: equipoise-stratified randomization.
13 Nov 2001 - STAR*D: have we learned the right lessons?
30 Dec 2007 - Mathematical vs biological thinking in clinical cancer research.
30 Dec 2001 - Sensitivity of the individual items of the Hamilton depression rating scale to response and its consequences for the assessment of efficacy.
16 Jan 2008 - The evaluation of multiple surrogate endpoints.
27 Feb 2001
Related Article Map
Legend:
- FREE Full text Article.
- Abstract only.
- Title only. More help.
See a large map of 100+ related articles.