|
|
| Research article summary (published 30 May 2009): |
Forward and backward repetition blindness in speed and accuracy.
Full Abstract
Repetition blindness (RB) was investigated in a new paradigm in which effects could stem from items preceding or following a target. Speeded-response tasks were used in which 3 critical items (C1, C2, and C3) were sequentially presented on each trial. In Experiments 1 and 2, participants were asked to judge whether C2 (the target) was present on each trial. Forward RB was examined in Experiment 1 via manipulation of whether C1 and C2 were repeated and backward RB was probed in Experiment 2 via manipulation of whether C2 and C3 were repeated. RB was successfully demonstrated in both experiments: Target presence judgments were slower and less accurate with repeated conditions than with unrepeated conditions. Experiment 3 involved a semantic categorization task in which participants had to judge whether C2 was a letter or a digit. Manipulating forward and backward repetition produced reliable effects on both reaction times and accuracy. The results are consistent with the idea that RB is due to failure in token individualization rather than type refractory problems or failure in memory retrieval. (c) 2009 APA, all rights reserved.
Author information
Author/s: Wong, Kin Fai Ellick (KF); Chen, Hsuan-Chih (HC);
Affiliation: Department of Management of Organizations, The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, Hong Kong. mnewong(-atsign-)ust.hk
Journal and publication information
Publication Type: Journal Article; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Journal: Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance (J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform), published in United States. (Language: eng)
Reference: 2009-Jun; vol 35 (issue 3) : pp 778-86
Dates: Created 2009/06/02; Completed 2009/07/20;
PMID: 19485691, status: MEDLINE (last retrieval date: 8/21/2009, IMS Date: )
Sourced from the National Library of Medicine. Abstract text and other information may be subject to copyright.
External Links for this article
(including full text providers, if available):
Click Electronic Full-text Provider Links to see options for finding the electronic full text links to this article. Note there may be a subscription or fee required for access to the full text. See our FAQ for information on finding FREE full text articles.
This article may also be located in paper journal collections available in many libraries. Use the Journal and Publication Information above to find the full article.
MeSH headings (categories)
This article was linked to the MESH Headings shown below.
Related articles
These are the highest related articles currently in the database:
- Emotional valence and arousal interact in attentional control.
28 Feb 2008 - An attentional blink for sequentially presented targets: evidence in favor of resource depletion accounts.
30 Jul 2008 - Now you see it, now you don't: repetition blindness for nonwords.
30 Dec 2007 - Temporal selection is suppressed, delayed, and diffused during the attentional blink.
30 Dec 2007 - A boost and bounce theory of temporal attention.
29 Sep 2008 - Attentional and perceptual factors affecting the attentional blink for faces and objects.
30 Jul 2008 - Attentional blinks as errors in temporal binding.
18 Sep 2007 - How preferential is the preferential encoding of threatening stimuli? Working memory biases in specific anxiety and the Attentional Blink.
18 Jun 2007 - Altered vision near the hands.
28 Oct 2007 - Delay of selective attention during the attentional blink.
22 Jul 2008
Related Article Map
Legend:
- FREE Full text Article.
- Abstract only.
- Title only. More help.
See a large map of 100+ related articles.