Frequency and motives of blood glucose self-monitoring in type 1 diabetes.

Full Abstract

AIMS: Recommendations for self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG) from the DCCT have not been implemented with the same rigour as recommendations for intensifying insulin therapy. We assessed the frequency of and motives for SMBG and compared SMBG behaviour with clinical, behavioural and demographic characteristics. METHODS: Cross-sectional Danish-British multicentre survey of 1076 consecutive patients with type 1 diabetes, who completed a detailed questionnaire on SMBG and related issues. The key variables were test frequency and motive. RESULTS: SMBG was performed daily by 39% of the patients and less than weekly by 24%. Sixty-seven percent reported to perform routine testing, while the remaining 33% only tested when hypo- or hyperglycaemia was suspected. Age, gender, and level of diabetes-related concern were associated with test pattern. Reported frequencies of mild and severe hypoglycaemia and awareness of hypoglycaemia were independently associated with testing behaviour, whereas the presence of late diabetic complications was not. Lower HbA1c was associated with more frequent testing. CONCLUSION: Patient compliance regarding SMBG is limited. Thus, almost two thirds of the patients do not perform daily SMBG and one third do not perform routine tests.

Author information

Author/s: Hansen, M V (MV); Pedersen-Bjergaard, U (U); Heller, S R (SR); Wallace, T M (TM); Rasmussen, A K (AK); Jørgensen, H V (HV); Pramming, S (S); Thorsteinsson, B (B);

Affiliation: Department of Cardiology and Endocrinology, Hillerød Hospital, Hillerød, Denmark. melis_vh(-atsign-)dadlnet.dk

Journal and publication information

Publication Type: Journal Article; Multicenter Study; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Journal: Diabetes research and clinical practice (Diabetes Res Clin Pract), published in Ireland. (Language: eng)

Reference: 2009-Aug; vol 85 (issue 2) : pp 183-8

Dates: Created 2009/07/14; Completed 2009/10/23;

PMID: 19497633, status: MEDLINE (last retrieved date: 10/23/2009)

Sourced from the National Library of Medicine. Abstract text and other information may be subject to copyright.

External Links for this article
(including full text providers, if available):

Click Electronic Full-text Provider Links to see options for finding the electronic full text links to this article. Note there may be a subscription or fee required for access to the full text. See our FAQ for information on finding FREE full text articles.

This article may also be located in paper journal collections available in many libraries. Use the Journal and Publication Information above to find the full article.