|
|
| Research article summary (published 30 Jul 2009): |
[The challenge of auditing by medical health insurance inspectors: development of individual case inspections according to 275ff SGB V]
(Herausforderung: MDK-Prüfung: Entwicklung der Einzelfallprüfungen gemäss 275ff SGB V.)
Full Abstract
BACKGROUND: The German DRG (diagnosis-related groups) system has changed since the inauguration in 2005, whereby written inquiries and on-site auditing have been carried out by the medical inspection service for health insurance companies (MDK). Modifications in the G-DRG system are reflected in changes in the MDK visitations. This article describes exactly how these examinations have changed over time. In order to achieve this all auditing reports were evaluated. RESULTS: In the beginning correct coding and documentation were the most interesting items for the health insurance fund inspectors. Nowadays, length of in-patient treatment and specific points relating to current changes in the G-DRG system are being questioned. All areas of the hospital have now been examined during this period. There was no change in the loss resulting from the regular examinations over the years. However, the effort and input of manpower are extremely high. CONCLUSIONS: To cope with the changes in the German DRG system hospitals have to be flexible. The experiences with the regular MDK visitations can positively influence hospital organizational structures.
Author information
Author/s: Vetter, S Y (SY); Studier-Fischer, S (S); Wentzensen, A (A); Frank, C (C);
Affiliation: Klinik für Unfallchirurgie und Orthopädie, BG-Unfallklinik Ludwigshafen, Ludwig-Guttmann-Str. 13, 67071, Ludwigshafen, Deutschland.
Journal and publication information
Publication Type: English Abstract; Journal Article
Journal: Der Unfallchirurg (Unfallchirurg), published in Germany. (Language: ger)
Reference: 2009-Aug; vol 112 (issue 8) : pp 756-8
Dates: Created 2009/08/20; Completed 2009/11/05;
PMID: 19597772, status: MEDLINE (last retrieval date: 11/5/2009, IMS Date: )
Sourced from the National Library of Medicine. Abstract text and other information may be subject to copyright.
External Links for this article
(including full text providers, if available):
Click Electronic Full-text Provider Links to see options for finding the electronic full text links to this article. Note there may be a subscription or fee required for access to the full text. See our FAQ for information on finding FREE full text articles.
This article may also be located in paper journal collections available in many libraries. Use the Journal and Publication Information above to find the full article.
MeSH headings (categories)
This article was linked to the MESH Headings shown below.
Related articles
These are the highest related articles currently in the database:
- [DRG case references]
13 Jan 2004 - [Actual situation: Psychosomatic and psychotherapeutic medicine goes DRG]
30 Dec 2002 - [On the path to a diagnostic related groups system: consequences will eventually become clearer]
30 Oct 2001 - [Farewell to capitation fee system. Reimbursement guided by "Quali" et "Morbi"]
Apr 2008 - [Psychosocial counseling of skin cancer patients in these times of diagnosis related groups (DRG)]
30 Jul 2004 - [New treatment methods for patients with vascular disease--1: Closing the gaps]
30 Oct 2006 - [Centralized control of the treatment of patients with newly detected tuberculosis]
30 Jul 1984 - [Regulations for readmission of patients into the same hospital]
13 Jul 2005 - Medical audit: threat or opportunity for the medical profession. A comparative study of medical audit among medical specialists in general hospitals in The Netherlands and England, 1970-1999.
29 Nov 2001 - [Evaluation faulty admission--an element of quality assurance in self governing]
30 May 2001
Related Article Map
Legend:
- FREE Full text Article.
- Abstract only.
- Title only. More help.
See a large map of 100+ related articles.