|
|
| Research article summary (published 29 Jun 2009): |
Integrating experiential and distributional data to learn semantic representations.
Full Abstract
The authors identify 2 major types of statistical data from which semantic representations can be learned. These are denoted as experiential data and distributional data. Experiential data are derived by way of experience with the physical world and comprise the sensory-motor data obtained through sense receptors. Distributional data, by contrast, describe the statistical distribution of words across spoken and written language. The authors claim that experiential and distributional data represent distinct data types and that each is a nontrivial source of semantic information. Their theoretical proposal is that human semantic representations are derived from an optimal statistical combination of these 2 data types. Using a Bayesian probabilistic model, they demonstrate how word meanings can be learned by treating experiential and distributional data as a single joint distribution and learning the statistical structure that underlies it. The semantic representations that are learned in this manner are measurably more realistic-as verified by comparison to a set of human-based measures of semantic representation-than those available from either data type individually or from both sources independently. This is not a result of merely using quantitatively more data, but rather it is because experiential and distributional data are qualitatively distinct, yet intercorrelated, types of data. The semantic representations that are learned are based on statistical structures that exist both within and between the experiential and distributional data types. Copyright (c) 2009 APA, all rights reserved.
Author information
Author/s: Andrews, Mark (M); Vigliocco, Gabriella (G); Vinson, David (D);
Affiliation: Cognitive, Perceptual and Brain Sciences, University College London, London, UK. m.andrews(-atsign-)ucl.ac.uk
Grants: 31/S18 (Agency:Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council)
Journal and publication information
Publication Type: Journal Article; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Journal: Psychological review (Psychol Rev), published in United States. (Language: eng)
Reference: 2009-Jul; vol 116 (issue 3) : pp 463-98
Dates: Created 2009/07/21; Completed 2009/09/28;
PMID: 19618982, status: MEDLINE (last retrieval date: 9/28/2009, IMS Date: )
Sourced from the National Library of Medicine. Abstract text and other information may be subject to copyright.
External Links for this article
(including full text providers, if available):
Click Electronic Full-text Provider Links to see options for finding the electronic full text links to this article. Note there may be a subscription or fee required for access to the full text. See our FAQ for information on finding FREE full text articles.
This article may also be located in paper journal collections available in many libraries. Use the Journal and Publication Information above to find the full article.
MeSH headings (categories)
This article was linked to the MESH Headings shown below.
Related articles
These are the highest related articles currently in the database:
- Recognition failure of categorized words.
30 Aug 1987 - The contribution of category relationships to similarity ratings.
30 Aug 2001 - A posterior tale.
30 May 2007 - Voss JF: Stability of response hierarchies.
29 Sep 1967 - Priming of association test responses by differential verbal contexts.
29 Jun 1967 - Effects of relation similarity on part-whole decisions.
30 Mar 1988 - Retrieval inhibition from part-set cuing: a persisting enigma in memory research.
30 Oct 1984 - Subsumptive labeling as a variable in concept organization.
29 Apr 1966 - Norms for modifiers used by children in a restricted word-association task: grades 2 through 6.
30 Jan 1966 - Verbal learning and memory.
30 Dec 1967
Related Article Map
Legend:
- FREE Full text Article.
- Abstract only.
- Title only. More help.
See a large map of 100+ related articles.