|
|
| Research article summary (published 29 Jun 2009): |
A new lease of life for Thomson's bonds model of intelligence.
Full Abstract
Modern factor analysis is the outgrowth of Spearman's original "2-factor" model of intelligence, according to which a mental test score is regarded as the sum of a general factor and a specific factor. As early as 1914, Godfrey Thomson realized that the data did not require this interpretation and he demonstrated this by proposing what became known as his "bonds" model of intelligence. Van der Maas et al. (2006) have recently drawn attention to what they perceive as difficulties with both models and have proposed a 3rd model. Neither alternative requires the general factor that was at the core of Spearman's idea. Although Thomson's model has been largely forgotten, the authors show that it merits further consideration because it can compete, statistically and biologically, on equal terms with Spearman's model. In particular, they show that it is impossible to distinguish statistically between the 2 models. There are also lessons to be learnt from the way in which Thomson arrived at his model and from the subsequent debate between Spearman and Thomson. The extent to which the recent proposal by van der Maas et al. may offer any advantage over Spearman's and Thomson's models is unclear and requires further investigation. Copyright (c) 2009 APA, all rights reserved.
Author information
Author/s: Bartholomew, David J (DJ); Deary, Ian J (IJ); Lawn, Martin (M);
Affiliation: London School of Economics and Political Science, London, UK. djbartholomew(-atsign-)btinternet.com
Grants: (Agency:Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council)
Journal and publication information
Publication Type: Journal Article; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Journal: Psychological review (Psychol Rev), published in United States. (Language: eng)
Reference: 2009-Jul; vol 116 (issue 3) : pp 567-79
Dates: Created 2009/07/21; Completed 2009/09/28;
PMID: 19618987, status: MEDLINE (last retrieval date: 9/28/2009, IMS Date: )
Sourced from the National Library of Medicine. Abstract text and other information may be subject to copyright.
External Links for this article
(including full text providers, if available):
Click Electronic Full-text Provider Links to see options for finding the electronic full text links to this article. Note there may be a subscription or fee required for access to the full text. See our FAQ for information on finding FREE full text articles.
This article may also be located in paper journal collections available in many libraries. Use the Journal and Publication Information above to find the full article.
MeSH headings (categories)
This article was linked to the MESH Headings shown below.
Related articles
These are the highest related articles currently in the database:
- Association between IQ and neuropsychological test performance: commentary on Tremont, Hoffman, Scott, and Adams (1998).
30 Jan 2000 - Cross validation of the Hypnotic Induction Profile factor structure: simultaneous confirmatory factor analysis of two published samples.
29 Sep 1993 - Increasing the reliability of the fluid/crystallized difference score from the Kaufman Adolescent and Adult Intelligence Test with reliable component analysis.
30 May 2001 - Predicting item exposure parameters in computerized adaptive testing.
29 Apr 2008 - Fitting the factor analysis model in lI norm.
29 Apr 2005 - Studentized maximum root procedures for coherent analyses of two-factor fixed-effects designs.
30 Aug 2005 - [Brief considerations on the R. Gille mosaic test]
29 Dec 1967 - The standardization of tests: criteria and criticisms.
29 Nov 1973 - Relation between criteria: case-finding method and prevalence.
30 Dec 1986 - Exploring the structure of Zuckerman's Sensation Seeking Scale, Form V in a Spanish sample.
30 Jul 2004
Related Article Map
Legend:
- FREE Full text Article.
- Abstract only.
- Title only. More help.
See a large map of 100+ related articles.