Validating household reports of health care use in the medical expenditure panel survey.

Full Abstract

BACKGROUND: The Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS) is a widely used nationally representative survey of health care use and expenditures. Numerous studies raise concerns that use is underreported in household surveys. OBJECTIVE: To assess the quality of household reports in the MEPS and the impact of misreporting on descriptive and behavioral analyses. RESEARCH DESIGN: Participants in MEPS with Medicare coverage during 2001-2003 were matched to their Medicare enrollment and claims data (4,045 person-year observations). Household reports of Medicare-covered services for the matched sample were validated against Medicare claims. Standard models of the determinants of health care utilization were estimated with both MEPS and claims-based utilization measures. MEASURES: In-person interviews with household informants obtained data on hospital inpatient, emergency department (ED), and office-based visits. Comparable measures were created from the claims. RESULTS: In the validation sample, households accurately reported inpatient stays (agreement rate=0.96, kappa=0.89) and number of nights (Lin's concordance statistic=0.88). Households underreported ED visits by one-third (Lin's concordance statistic=0.51) and office visits by 19 percent (Lin's concordance statistic=0.67). CONCLUSIONS: Household respondents in the validation sample accurately report inpatient hospitalizations but underreport ED and office visits. Behavioral analyses are largely unaffected because underreporting cuts across all sociodemographic groups.

Author information

Author/s: Zuvekas, Samuel H (SH); Olin, Gary L (GL);

Affiliation: Center for Financing, Access, and Cost Trends, Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, Rockville, MD 20850, USA. samuel.zuvekas(-atsign-)ahrq.hhs.gov

Journal and publication information

Publication Type: Comparative Study; Journal Article

Journal: Health services research (Health Serv Res), published in United States. (Language: eng)

Reference: 2009-Oct; vol 44 (issue 5 Pt 1) : pp 1679-700

Dates: Created 2009/09/08; Completed 2009/09/29;

PMID: 19619249, status: MEDLINE (last retrieval date: 9/29/2009, IMS Date: )

Sourced from the National Library of Medicine. Abstract text and other information may be subject to copyright.

External Links for this article
(including full text providers, if available):

Click Electronic Full-text Provider Links to see options for finding the electronic full text links to this article. Note there may be a subscription or fee required for access to the full text. See our FAQ for information on finding FREE full text articles.

This article may also be located in paper journal collections available in many libraries. Use the Journal and Publication Information above to find the full article.