|
|
| Research article summary (published 30 Jul 2009): |
The sensitivity of auditory-motor representations to subtle changes in auditory feedback while singing.
Full Abstract
Singing requires accurate control of the fundamental frequency (F0) of the voice. This study examined trained singers' and untrained singers' (nonsingers') sensitivity to subtle manipulations in auditory feedback and the subsequent effect on the mapping between F0 feedback and vocal control. Participants produced the consonant-vowel /ta/ while receiving auditory feedback that was shifted up and down in frequency. Results showed that singers and nonsingers compensated to a similar degree when presented with frequency-altered feedback (FAF); however, singers' F0 values were consistently closer to the intended pitch target. Moreover, singers initiated their compensatory responses when auditory feedback was shifted up or down 6 cents or more, compared to nonsingers who began compensating when feedback was shifted up 26 cents and down 22 cents. Additionally, examination of the first 50 ms of vocalization indicated that participants commenced subsequent vocal utterances, during FAF, near the F0 value on previous shift trials. Interestingly, nonsingers commenced F0 productions below the pitch target and increased their F0 until they matched the note. Thus, singers and nonsingers rely on an internal model to regulate voice F0, but singers' models appear to be more sensitive in response to subtle discrepancies in auditory feedback.
Author information
Author/s: Keough, Dwayne (D); Jones, Jeffery A (JA);
Affiliation: Department of Psychology, Wilfrid Laurier University, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada.
Grants: DC-08092 (Agency:NIDCD NIH HHS)
Journal and publication information
Publication Type: Journal Article; Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Journal: The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America (J Acoust Soc Am), published in United States. (Language: eng)
Reference: 2009-Aug; vol 126 (issue 2) : pp 837-46
Dates: Created 2009/07/30; Completed 2009/10/06;
PMID: 19640048, status: MEDLINE (last retrieval date: 10/6/2009, IMS Date: )
Sourced from the National Library of Medicine. Abstract text and other information may be subject to copyright.
External Links for this article
(including full text providers, if available):
Click Electronic Full-text Provider Links to see options for finding the electronic full text links to this article. Note there may be a subscription or fee required for access to the full text. See our FAQ for information on finding FREE full text articles.
This article may also be located in paper journal collections available in many libraries. Use the Journal and Publication Information above to find the full article.
MeSH headings (categories)
This article was linked to the MESH Headings shown below.
Related articles
These are the highest related articles currently in the database:
- Effects of perturbation magnitude and voice F0 level on the pitch-shift reflex.
29 Nov 2007 - Hearing of note: an electrophysiologic and psychoacoustic comparison of pitch discrimination between vocal and instrumental musicians.
2 Sep 2008 - Auditory feedback control for improvement of gait in patients with Multiple Sclerosis.
18 Feb 2007 - Remapping auditory-motor representations in voice production.
9 Oct 2005 - Practice-related modulations of force enslaving and cortical activity as revealed by EEG.
29 Apr 2004 - On the influence of interaural differences on temporal perception of noise bursts of different durations.
30 Jan 2008 - Multimodal feedback for the acquisition of small targets.
13 Jul 2005 - Neural latencies do not explain the auditory and audio-visual flash-lag effect.
30 Oct 2005 - Feedback-based error monitoring processes during musical performance: an ERP study.
12 Feb 2008 - Number 1 in the ratings: a television-based learning activity.
30 May 2008
Related Article Map
Legend:
- FREE Full text Article.
- Abstract only.
- Title only. More help.
See a large map of 100+ related articles.