|
|
| Research article summary (published 29 Jun 2009): |
Using frames to influence consumer willingness to pay for the patient health record: a randomized experiment.
Full Abstract
The American College of Medical Informatics rated the lack of willingness to pay for the patient health record (PHR) as the biggest obstacles to its rapid diffusion. Extending research propositions from the decision sciences and political communication, this study tests the influence of different types of emphasis frames on increasing consumer willingness to pay for the PHR. Using a randomized experiment embedded within a probability survey, the effects of 3 different types of emphasis frames (individual-focused, collective-focused, and joint), along with a no-frames control, are tested on a sample of early and later technology adopters. The results indicate a significant relationship between the type of frame and the type of adopter. Early adopters were more susceptible to individual-focused frames that made causal attributions at the individual level, whereas later adopters were significantly influenced by collective-focused frames that made causal attributions at the societal level. Interestingly, the framing effect continued and significantly influenced both early and later adopters' willingness to pay for the PHR. The findings demonstrate the need to carefully communicate the value of a technology to adopters and suggest the possibility of using frames to spur the diffusion of PHRs.
Author information
Author/s: Vishwanath, Arun (A);
Affiliation: Department of Communication, State University of New York at Buffalo, USA. avishy(-atsign-)buffalo.edu
Journal and publication information
Publication Type: Journal Article; Randomized Controlled Trial
Journal: Health communication (Health Commun), published in United States. (Language: eng)
Reference: 2009-Jul; vol 24 (issue 5) : pp 473-82
Dates: Created 2009/08/06; Completed 2009/11/02;
PMID: 19657829, status: MEDLINE (last retrieval date: 11/2/2009, IMS Date: )
Sourced from the National Library of Medicine. Abstract text and other information may be subject to copyright.
External Links for this article
(including full text providers, if available):
Click Electronic Full-text Provider Links to see options for finding the electronic full text links to this article. Note there may be a subscription or fee required for access to the full text. See our FAQ for information on finding FREE full text articles.
This article may also be located in paper journal collections available in many libraries. Use the Journal and Publication Information above to find the full article.
MeSH headings (categories)
This article was linked to the MESH Headings shown below.
Related articles
These are the highest related articles currently in the database:
- Empowering patients undergoing in vitro fertilization by providing Internet access to medical data.
7 Apr 2007 - PHRs and physician practices.
30 Mar 2007 - CIOs making soft sell when calculating ROI.
30 Jul 2002 - Patient review of selected electronic health record data improves visit experience.
9 Oct 2007 - Patient care experience enhanced by use of online journals.
9 Oct 2007 - Access to electronic health records in primary care-a survey of patients' views.
24 Oct 2004 - Personal health record use by patients as perceived by ambulatory care physicians in Nebraska and South Dakota: a cross-sectional study.
27 Sep 2008 - Towards consumer-friendly PHRs: patients' experience with reviewing their health records.
9 Oct 2007 - Potential impacts of patient access to their electronic care records.
30 Dec 2004 - Copy fees and patients' rights to obtain a copy of their medical records: from law to reality.
30 Dec 2004
Related Article Map
Legend:
- FREE Full text Article.
- Abstract only.
- Title only. More help.
See a large map of 100+ related articles.