|
|
| Research article summary (published 5 Aug 2009): |
Ethical principles in health research and review process.
Full Abstract
In this paper I want to reflect on the fundamental ethical principles and their application in different particular contexts, especially in health research and the ethics review process. Four fundamental ethical principles have been identified and widely discussed in bioethical literature. These principles namely are: autonomy or respect for others, beneficence, non-maleficence and justice. These principles have cross-cultural validity, relevance and applicability. Every real-life situation and every concrete particular case in which ethical decision-making is called-for is unique and different from all others; but the same fundamental ethical principles are relevant and used in addressing all such cases and situations. Very often ethical problems will present themselves in the form of dilemmas and it is then necessary to use the same fundamental principles to analyze the situations, to argue persuasively and cogently with competence for the best options or choices in such situations. The issues I will be dealing with in this paper are necessarily more abstract and theoretical, but we will be discussing them from a very practical viewpoint and impulse, with a view to application in concrete real-life situations. The paper ends with some sample practical examples of cases that the reader can use to test his/her grasp of the principles, how to apply them, how to balance them in differing situations and contexts and how to adjudicate between them when they seem to be in conflict.
Author information
Author/s: Tangwa, Godfrey B (GB);
Affiliation: University of Yaounde,Yaounde, Cameroon. gbtangwa(-atsign-)yahoo.com
Journal and publication information
Publication Type: Journal Article
Journal: Acta tropica (Acta Trop), published in Netherlands. (Language: eng)
Reference: 2009-Nov; vol 112 Suppl 1 (issue ) : pp S2-7
Dates: Created 2009/09/22; Completed 2009/10/06;
PMID: 19665441, status: MEDLINE (last retrieval date: 10/6/2009, IMS Date: )
Sourced from the National Library of Medicine. Abstract text and other information may be subject to copyright.
External Links for this article
(including full text providers, if available):
Click Electronic Full-text Provider Links to see options for finding the electronic full text links to this article. Note there may be a subscription or fee required for access to the full text. See our FAQ for information on finding FREE full text articles.
This article may also be located in paper journal collections available in many libraries. Use the Journal and Publication Information above to find the full article.
MeSH headings (categories)
This article was linked to the MESH Headings shown below.
Related articles
These are the highest related articles currently in the database:
- Keeping medical research ethical.
6 Jul 2005 - Does research ethics rest on a mistake?
30 Dec 2004 - Individualism and the ethics of research on humans.
28 Feb 2004 - Unrest about research.
28 Feb 2008 - Biomedical research ethics.
29 Sep 2002 - Letter to the editor regarding the 5th Global Forum on Bioethics in Research.
30 Dec 2003 - [Ethics and research]
30 Dec 2007 - Research ethics in Russia.
30 Dec 2001 - In defense of the duty to participate in biomedical research.
29 Sep 2008 - The history and moral foundations of human-subject research.
30 Jan 2007
Related Article Map
Legend:
- FREE Full text Article.
- Abstract only.
- Title only. More help.
See a large map of 100+ related articles.