|
|
| Research article summary (published 30 Aug 2009): |
Motivated comprehension regulation: vigilant versus eager metacognitive control.
Full Abstract
The more accurately people assess their comprehension, the more likely they are to engage in study behaviors that precisely target gaps in their learning. However, comprehension regulation involves more than knowing when to implement a new study strategy; it also involves deciding which strategy will most effectively resolve one's confusion. In two experiments, we explored how people's motivational orientations influence which study strategies they select to regulate their comprehension. In Experiment 1, people who were motivated to vigilantly protect against potential mistakes (i.e., prevention-focused individuals) were more likely to adopt a rereading strategy than people who were motivated to eagerly pursue new learning opportunities (i.e., promotion-focused individuals). In Experiment 2, this difference in strategy use emerged specifically in response to confusing sentences that had been inserted into the text. Furthermore, by using rereading strategies to resolve their confusion, prevention-focused individuals performed better than promotion-focused individuals on a comprehension test and a transfer task.
Author information
Author/s: Miele, David B (DB); Molden, Daniel C (DC); Gardner, Wendi L (WL);
Affiliation: Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois, USA. dmiele(-atsign-)columbia.edu
Journal and publication information
Publication Type: Journal Article; Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S.
Journal: Memory & cognition (Mem Cognit), published in United States. (Language: eng)
Reference: 2009-Sep; vol 37 (issue 6) : pp 779-95
Dates: Created 2009/08/14; Completed 2009/10/19;
PMID: 19679858, status: MEDLINE (last retrieval date: 10/19/2009, IMS Date: )
Sourced from the National Library of Medicine. Abstract text and other information may be subject to copyright.
External Links for this article
(including full text providers, if available):
Click Electronic Full-text Provider Links to see options for finding the electronic full text links to this article. Note there may be a subscription or fee required for access to the full text. See our FAQ for information on finding FREE full text articles.
This article may also be located in paper journal collections available in many libraries. Use the Journal and Publication Information above to find the full article.
MeSH headings (categories)
This article was linked to the MESH Headings shown below.
Related articles
These are the highest related articles currently in the database:
- Reading strategies and prior knowledge in learning from hypertext.
29 Jun 2006 - Readers' experiences of characters' goals and actions.
30 Oct 2006 - Co-reference and reasoning.
30 Dec 2003 - Question asking and eye tracking during cognitive disequilibrium: comprehending illustrated texts on devices when the devices break down.
29 Sep 2005 - Reality compared with its alternatives: age differences in judgments of regret and relief.
30 Aug 2004 - Inference vs control sentences: are readers able to detect our intended differences?
27 Feb 2005 - Time travel through language: temporal shifts rapidly decrease information accessibility during reading.
30 Jul 2008 - Are students' beliefs about knowledge and learning associated with their reported use of learning strategies?
30 May 2005 - Preferred mental models in reasoning about spatial relations.
29 Nov 2007 - When shoes become hammers: Goal-derived categorization training enhances problem-solving performance.
29 Jun 2006
Related Article Map
Legend:
- FREE Full text Article.
- Abstract only.
- Title only. More help.
See a large map of 100+ related articles.