|
|
| Research article summary (published 30 Aug 2009): |
Enhancement and suppression effects resulting from information structuring in sentences.
Full Abstract
Information structuring through the use of cleft sentences increases the processing efficiency of references to elements within the scope of focus. Furthermore, there is evidence that putting certain types of emphasis on individual words not only enhances their subsequent processing, but also protects these words from becoming suppressed in the wake of subsequent information, suggesting mechanisms of enhancement and suppression. In Experiment 1, we showed that clefted constructions facilitate the integration of subsequent sentences that make reference to elements within the scope of focus, and that they decrease the efficiency with reference to elements outside of the scope of focus. In Experiment 2, using an auditory text-change-detection paradigm, we showed that focus has similar effects on the strength of memory representations. These results add to the evidence for enhancement and suppression as mechanisms of sentence processing and clarify that the effects occur within sentences having a marked focus structure.
Author information
Author/s: Sanford, Alison J S (AJ); Price, Jessica (J); Sanford, Anthony J (AJ);
Affiliation: University of Strathclyde, Glasgow, Scotland. alison.sanford(-atsign-)strath.ac.uk
Journal and publication information
Publication Type: Journal Article; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Journal: Memory & cognition (Mem Cognit), published in United States. (Language: eng)
Reference: 2009-Sep; vol 37 (issue 6) : pp 880-8
Dates: Created 2009/08/14; Completed 2009/10/19;
PMID: 19679866, status: MEDLINE (last retrieval date: 10/19/2009, IMS Date: )
Sourced from the National Library of Medicine. Abstract text and other information may be subject to copyright.
External Links for this article
(including full text providers, if available):
Click Electronic Full-text Provider Links to see options for finding the electronic full text links to this article. Note there may be a subscription or fee required for access to the full text. See our FAQ for information on finding FREE full text articles.
This article may also be located in paper journal collections available in many libraries. Use the Journal and Publication Information above to find the full article.
MeSH headings (categories)
This article was linked to the MESH Headings shown below.
Related articles
These are the highest related articles currently in the database:
- Activating basic category exemplars in sentence contexts: a dynamical account.
28 Feb 2008 - Tracking the what and why of speakers' choices: prosodic boundaries and the length of constituents.
29 Sep 2006 - The influence of the immediate visual context on incremental thematic role-assignment: evidence from eye-movements in depicted events.
30 Jan 2005 - If you say thee uh you are describing something hard: the on-line attribution of disfluency during reference comprehension.
30 Aug 2007 - Argument status and PP-attachment.
30 Aug 2006 - The parser doesn't ignore intransitivity, after all.
29 Apr 2007 - Does the effect of familiarity on proofreading change with encoding task and time?
29 Jun 2006 - It's no accident: Our bias for intentional explanations.
7 Aug 2008 - Time course of retrieving conceptual information: a speed-accuracy trade-off study.
29 Sep 2006 - Ambiguous pronoun resolution: contrasting the first-mention and subject-preference accounts.
30 Mar 2005
Related Article Map
Legend:
- FREE Full text Article.
- Abstract only.
- Title only. More help.
See a large map of 100+ related articles.