Acoustic, mechanical and galvanic stimulation modes elicit ocular vestibular-evoked myogenic potentials.

Full Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This study compared the characteristic parameters of ocular vestibular-evoked myogenic potentials (oVEMPs) elicited by the air-conducted sound (ACS) and bone-conducted vibration (BCV) stimulation modes as well as the galvanic vestibular stimulation (GVS) mode. DESIGN: Fifteen healthy subjects underwent oVEMP tests using ACS (127 dBSPL), BCV (142dB force level), and GVS (5mA) modes. The response rate, latencies of nI and pI, nI-pI interval and amplitude were measured for each mode and compared among modes. RESULTS: All 15 healthy subjects (30 ears) had 100% response rates in both BCV- and GVS-oVEMPs, exhibiting a response rate significantly higher than 80% in ACS-oVEMPs. The mean nI latency was the shortest in the GVS mode, followed by BCV and then ACS modes. The variation among the latencies of the three modes was significant. Likewise, the mean nI-pI amplitudes in ACS-, BCV- and GVS modes varied significantly. However, the mean nI-pI interval did not differ significantly among the three modes. CONCLUSIONS: Among the ACS (127 dBSPL), BCV (142dB force level), and GVS (5mA) modes, the BCV mode yields a 100% response rate and the largest nI-pI amplitude of oVEMPs. SIGNIFICANCE: The oVEMPs in ACS and GVS modes may help to differentiate the saccular from the retro-saccular lesions. If ACS-oVEMPs are normal, then oVEMPs in BCV and GVS modes can distinguish between utricular and retro-utricular disorders. Restated, oVEMPs in ACS, BCV, and GVS modes may promote the topographical delineation of the lesion site of the otolithic-ocular reflex pathway.

Author information

Author/s: Cheng, Po-Wen (PW); Chen, Chien-Cheng (CC); Wang, Shou-Jen (SJ); Young, Yi-Ho (YH);

Affiliation: Department of Otolaryngology, Far Eastern Memorial Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.

Journal and publication information

Publication Type: Journal Article

Journal: Clinical neurophysiology : official journal of the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology (Clin Neurophysiol), published in Netherlands. (Language: eng)

Reference: 2009-Oct; vol 120 (issue 10) : pp 1841-4

Dates: Created 2009/10/26; Completed 2009/11/17;

PMID: 19717336, status: MEDLINE (last retrieved date: 11/17/2009)

Sourced from the National Library of Medicine. Abstract text and other information may be subject to copyright.

External Links for this article
(including full text providers, if available):

Click Electronic Full-text Provider Links to see options for finding the electronic full text links to this article. Note there may be a subscription or fee required for access to the full text. See our FAQ for information on finding FREE full text articles.

This article may also be located in paper journal collections available in many libraries. Use the Journal and Publication Information above to find the full article.