|
|
| Research article summary (published 30 Aug 2009): |
Meta-analytic interval estimation for standardized and unstandardized mean differences.
Full Abstract
The fixed-effects (FE) meta-analytic confidence intervals for unstandardized and standardized mean differences are based on an unrealistic assumption of effect-size homogeneity and perform poorly when this assumption is violated. The random-effects (RE) meta-analytic confidence intervals are based on an unrealistic assumption that the selected studies represent a random sample from a large superpopulation of studies. The RE approach cannot be justified in typical meta-analysis applications in which studies are nonrandomly selected. New FE meta-analytic confidence intervals for unstandardized and standardized mean differences are proposed that are easy to compute and perform properly under effect-size heterogeneity and nonrandomly selected studies. The proposed meta-analytic confidence intervals may be used to combine unstandardized or standardized mean differences from studies having either independent samples or dependent samples and may also be used to integrate results from previous studies into a new study. An alternative approach to assessing effect-size heterogeneity is presented.
Author information
Author/s: Bonett, Douglas G (DG);
Affiliation: Department of Statistics, Iowa State University, Ames IA 50011, USA. dgbonett(-atsign-)iastate.edu
Journal and publication information
Publication Type: Journal Article
Journal: Psychological methods (Psychol Methods), published in United States. (Language: eng)
Reference: 2009-Sep; vol 14 (issue 3) : pp 225-38
Dates: Created 2009/09/01; Completed 2009/11/02;
PMID: 19719359, status: MEDLINE (last retrieval date: 11/2/2009, IMS Date: )
Sourced from the National Library of Medicine. Abstract text and other information may be subject to copyright.
External Links for this article
(including full text providers, if available):
Click Electronic Full-text Provider Links to see options for finding the electronic full text links to this article. Note there may be a subscription or fee required for access to the full text. See our FAQ for information on finding FREE full text articles.
This article may also be located in paper journal collections available in many libraries. Use the Journal and Publication Information above to find the full article.
MeSH headings (categories)
This article was linked to the MESH Headings shown below.
Related articles
These are the highest related articles currently in the database:
- Comparing dependent correlations.
30 Dec 2007 - r equivalent: A simple effect size indicator.
29 Nov 2003 - Asymptotically distribution-free (ADF) interval estimation of coefficient alpha.
30 May 2007 - Random assignment of available cases: bootstrap standard errors and confidence intervals.
29 Nov 2001 - Model fitting in (n+1) dimensions.
29 Apr 2003 - Statistical reform in psychology: is anything changing?
27 Feb 2007 - AppleTree: a multinomial processing tree modeling program for Macintosh computers.
30 Oct 1999 - Multinomial processing tree models: an implementation.
30 Oct 1999 - QMLE: fast, robust, and efficient estimation of distribution functions based on quantiles.
30 Oct 2003 - A comparison of inclusive and restrictive strategies in modern missing data procedures.
29 Nov 2001
Related Article Map
Legend:
- FREE Full text Article.
- Abstract only.
- Title only. More help.
See a large map of 100+ related articles.