Treatment of a segmental nerve defect in the rat with use of bioabsorbable synthetic nerve conduits: a comparison of commercially available conduits.

Full Abstract

BACKGROUND: The use of biodegradable synthetic nerve conduits for the reconstruction of segmental nerve defects has been extensively reported in both animal and human studies, with a majority of studies evaluating sensory nerve recovery. However, few studies have compared these nerve conduits for functional motor recovery. The purpose of this study was to compare three commercially available, synthetic, bioabsorbable nerve conduits and autograft with respect to compound muscle action potentials, maximum isometric tetanic force, wet muscle weight, and nerve histomorphometry. METHODS: Eighty Lewis rats were divided into four groups according to the type of repair of a 10-mm excision of the sciatic nerve: group I had a reversed autograft; group II, a poly-DL-lactide-epsilon-caprolactone conduit; group III, a type-I collagen conduit; and group IV, a polyglycolic acid conduit. All results were compared with the contralateral side. At twelve weeks, the rats underwent bilateral measurements of the compound muscle action potentials of the tibialis anterior and flexor digiti quinti brevis muscles, isometric tetanic force and muscle weight of the tibialis anterior, and peroneal nerve histomorphometry. RESULTS: At twelve weeks, no difference in the percentage of recovery between the autograft and the poly-DL-lactide-epsilon-caprolactone conduit was observed with respect to compound muscle action potentials, isometric muscle force, muscle weight, and axon count measurements. The poly-DL-lactide-epsilon-caprolactone and collagen conduits remained structurally stable at twelve weeks, while the polyglycolic acid conduits had completely collapsed. The polyglycolic acid conduit had the poorest results, with a recovery rate of 15% for compound muscle action potentials and 29% for muscle force. CONCLUSIONS: The functional outcome in this rat model was similar for the autograft and the poly-DL-lactide-epsilon-caprolactone conduits when they were used to reconstruct a 10-mm sciatic nerve defect. Functional recovery following the use of the polyglycolic acid conduit was the poorest.

Author information

Author/s: Shin, Richard H (RH); Friedrich, Patricia F (PF); Crum, Brian A (BA); Bishop, Allen T (AT); Shin, Alexander Y (AY);

Affiliation: Microvascular Research Laboratory, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA.

Journal and publication information

Publication Type: Comparative Study; Journal Article

Journal: The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume (J Bone Joint Surg Am), published in United States. (Language: eng)

Reference: 2009-Sep; vol 91 (issue 9) : pp 2194-204

Dates: Created 2009/09/02; Completed 2009/09/22;

PMID: 19723997, status: MEDLINE (last retrieval date: 9/22/2009, IMS Date: )

Sourced from the National Library of Medicine. Abstract text and other information may be subject to copyright.

External Links for this article
(including full text providers, if available):

Click Electronic Full-text Provider Links to see options for finding the electronic full text links to this article. Note there may be a subscription or fee required for access to the full text. See our FAQ for information on finding FREE full text articles.

This article may also be located in paper journal collections available in many libraries. Use the Journal and Publication Information above to find the full article.

MeSH headings (categories)

This article was linked to the MESH Headings shown below.

Polyesters
Polyglycolic Acid
Rats
Rats, Inbred Lew
Recovery of Function
Sciatic Nerve - injuries; physiology; surgery; transplantation
Tissue Scaffolds
Transplantation, Autologous

Associated Chemicals: Biocompatible Materials (0) ; Collagen Type I (0) ; Polyesters (0) ; Polyglycolic Acid (26009-03-0) ; lactide-caprolactone copolymer (70524-20-8)

These are the highest related articles currently in the database: