|
|
| Research article summary (published 29 Sep 2009): |
Verbal representation in task order control: an examination with transition and task cues in random task switching.
Full Abstract
Recent task-switching studies in which a predictable task sequence has been used have indicated that verbal representation contributes to the control of task order information. The present study focused on the role of verbal representation in sequential task decisions, which are an important part of task order control, and examined the effects of articulatory suppression in a random-task-cuing paradigm with two different types of cues presented just before the presentation of a stimulus: a transition cue and a task cue. The former cue provided information only about switching or repeating the task, whereas the latter was associated directly with the identity of the task (i.e., indicating a parity or a magnitude task). In Experiment 1, in which transition cues guided task sequences, articulatory suppression impaired performance in both repetition and switch trials, thereby increasing the mixing costs. In Experiment 2, in which a task cue, rather than a transition cue, was presented to examine the influence of a cue-decoding process, articulatory suppression had no specific effect on task performance. Experiment 3, in which the transition cue and the task cue were randomly presented in the same block to equalize the memory load and task strategy for the two types of cues, confirmed that articulatory suppression significantly increased the mixing costs only in transition cue trials. The results from the three experiments indicated that the use of verbal representation is effective in sequential task decision-that is, in selecting a task set on the basis of transient task order information in both repetition and switch trials.
Author information
Author/s: Saeki, Erina (E); Saito, Satoru (S);
Affiliation: Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan. e.saeki(-atsign-)hw5.ecs.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Journal and publication information
Publication Type: Journal Article; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Journal: Memory & cognition (Mem Cognit), published in United States. (Language: eng)
Reference: 2009-Oct; vol 37 (issue 7) : pp 1040-50
Dates: Created 2009/09/11; Completed 2009/11/02;
PMID: 19744942, status: MEDLINE (last retrieval date: 11/2/2009, IMS Date: )
Sourced from the National Library of Medicine. Abstract text and other information may be subject to copyright.
External Links for this article
(including full text providers, if available):
Click Electronic Full-text Provider Links to see options for finding the electronic full text links to this article. Note there may be a subscription or fee required for access to the full text. See our FAQ for information on finding FREE full text articles.
This article may also be located in paper journal collections available in many libraries. Use the Journal and Publication Information above to find the full article.
MeSH headings (categories)
This article was linked to the MESH Headings shown below.
Related articles
These are the highest related articles currently in the database:
- Comparing switch costs: alternating runs and explicit cuing.
29 Apr 2007 - Separating cue encoding from target processing in the explicit task-cuing procedure: are there "true" task switch effects?
29 Apr 2007 - Task switching and action sequencing.
17 Nov 2005 - Global inhibition and midcourse corrections in speeded aiming.
29 Sep 2008 - Cue-based preparation and stimulus-based priming of tasks in task switching.
27 Feb 2006 - Task switching versus cue switching: using transition cuing to disentangle sequential effects in task-switching performance.
27 Feb 2007 - Automatic and controlled response inhibition: associative learning in the go/no-go and stop-signal paradigms.
30 Oct 2008 - Eye movements, not hypercompatible mappings, are critical for eliminating the cost of task set reconfiguration.
29 Sep 2006 - Avoidance behavior can function as a negative occasion setter.
30 Dec 2004 - Backward crosstalk effects in psychological refractory period paradigms: effects of second-task response types on first-task response latencies.
18 Oct 2005
Related Article Map
Legend:
- FREE Full text Article.
- Abstract only.
- Title only. More help.
See a large map of 100+ related articles.