Find-Health-Articles.com - making medical research available to everyone
Research article summary (published 29 Sep 2009):

Functional reading acuity and performance: Comparison of 2 accommodating intraocular lenses.

Full Abstract

PURPOSE: To compare functional reading acuity and speed with 2 models of accommodating intraocular lenses (IOLs). SETTING: Four of 12 investigative sites in a U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) clinical study. METHODS: In this observational study, which was part of an ongoing FDA clinical trial, the MNRead functional reading test was used to compare the reading performance of patients with bilateral Tetraflex IOLs (Group 1) and a consecutive series of patients with bilateral Crystalens IOLs (Group 2) presenting at approximately 1 year postoperatively at 4 ophthalmic practices. The 2 groups were well matched for age, sex, mean postoperative time, and mean level of postoperative corrected distance visual acuity. All examinations were scored at a central reading center. RESULTS: Group 1 comprised 96 patients and Group 2, 55 patients. Patients in Group 1 read better than those in Group 2 at print sizes of 20/63 (P = .004), 20/50 (P = .002), 20/40 (P = .001), 20/32 (P = .003), and 20/25 (P = .001). A statistically significantly higher proportion of patients in Group 1 than in Group 2 read 80 words per minute or more throughout the range of print sizes (P = .002). CONCLUSION: Near reading ability was better with the Tetraflex accommodating IOL than with the Crystalens accommodating IOL at all print sizes between 20/25 and 20/63.

 

Author information

Author/s: Brown, David (D); Dougherty, Paul (P); Gills, James P (JP); Hunkeler, John (J); Sanders, Donald R (DR); Sanders, Monica L (ML);

Affiliation: Center for Clinical Research, Elmhurst, Illinois 60126, USA.

Journal and publication information

Publication Type: Clinical Trial; Comparative Study; Journal Article; Multicenter Study; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Journal: Journal of cataract and refractive surgery (J Cataract Refract Surg), published in United States. (Language: eng)

Reference: 2009-Oct; vol 35 (issue 10) : pp 1711-4

Dates: Created 2009/09/28; Completed 2009/10/30;

PMID: 19781464, status: MEDLINE (last retrieval date: 10/30/2009, IMS Date: )

Sourced from the National Library of Medicine. Abstract text and other information may be subject to copyright.

Comments and Corrections

CommentIn: J Cataract Refract Surg. 2009 Oct;35(10):1655. (PMID: 19781454)

External Links for this article
(including full text providers, if available):

Click Electronic Full-text Provider Links to see options for finding the electronic full text links to this article. Note there may be a subscription or fee required for access to the full text. See our FAQ for information on finding FREE full text articles.

This article may also be located in paper journal collections available in many libraries. Use the Journal and Publication Information above to find the full article.

MeSH headings (categories)

This article was linked to the MESH Headings shown below.

Related articles

These are the highest related articles currently in the database:

See 100+ related articles.

Related Article Map

11/29/2003
2/28/2008
Higher Relevance Score (100)
Lower Relevance Score (85)

Legend: - FREE Full text Article. - Abstract only. - Title only. More help.

See a large map of 100+ related articles.

© Advanogy LLC 2003-2009 - All rights reserved. Terms of Use | Contact Us | Index