The "fear factor" for surgical masks and face shields, as perceived by children and their parents.

Full Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The goal was to determine whether young children and their parents prefer physicians wearing clear face shields or surgical masks. METHODS: Eighty children (4-10 years of age) and their guardians were recruited from a pediatric emergency department. A survey and color photographs of the same male and female physicians wearing face shields and surgical masks were distributed. The parents were asked to decide which set of physicians they would prefer to care for their children and with which set of physicians they thought their children would be most comfortable. The children then were asked to decide which set of physicians they would prefer to take care of them and why. The children also were asked whether they found any of the physicians frightening and, if so, why. RESULTS: Fifty-one percent of parents preferred the pictures of physicians wearing face shields, and 62% thought that their children would choose the physicians in the face shields because their faces were visible and therefore less frightening. However, 59% of children stated that either set of physicians would be fine and neither was frightening; if given a choice, 49% would choose physicians in face shields. CONCLUSIONS: Physicians and parents have a perception that surgical masks are frightening to all children. Our study has shown that this perception is not completely true. Face shields may be a better choice, however, because both parents and children would prefer this option.

Author information

Author/s: Forgie, Sarah E (SE); Reitsma, Jeff (J); Spady, Don (D); Wright, Bruce (B); Stobart, Kent (K);

Affiliation: Department of Pediatrics, University of Alberta, Room 8213, Aberhart Center, 11402 University Ave, Edmonton, AB, T6G 2J3, Canada. sarahforgie(-atsign-)cha.ab.ca

Journal and publication information

Publication Type: Comparative Study; Journal Article

Journal: Pediatrics (Pediatrics), published in United States. (Language: eng)

Reference: 2009-Oct; vol 124 (issue 4) : pp e777-81

Dates: Created 2009/09/29; Completed 2009/10/23;

PMID: 19786438, status: MEDLINE (last retrieval date: 10/23/2009, IMS Date: )

Sourced from the National Library of Medicine. Abstract text and other information may be subject to copyright.

External Links for this article
(including full text providers, if available):

Click Electronic Full-text Provider Links to see options for finding the electronic full text links to this article. Note there may be a subscription or fee required for access to the full text. See our FAQ for information on finding FREE full text articles.

This article may also be located in paper journal collections available in many libraries. Use the Journal and Publication Information above to find the full article.