[Reporting guidelines for research: curse or blessing?]

(Leitlinien für Forschungsberichte: Fluch oder Segen?)

Full Abstract

No abstract is available for this article. See 'Journal and Publication Information' further down the page for details that may assist you in locating this article in electronic or hard copy media. The 'Related articles' section also further down the page, where available, may show links to abstracts of articles covering similar topics.

Author information

Author/s: Ziegler, A (A);

Journal and publication information

Publication Type: Comment; Editorial

Journal: Deutsche medizinische Wochenschrift (1946) (Dtsch Med Wochenschr), published in Germany. (Language: ger)

Reference: 2009-Oct; vol 134 (issue 41) : pp 2077

Dates: Created 2009/10/05; Completed 2009/10/09;

PMID: 19802770, status: MEDLINE (last retrieval date: 10/9/2009, IMS Date: )

Sourced from the National Library of Medicine. Abstract text and other information may be subject to copyright.

Comments and Corrections

CommentOn: Dtsch Med Wochenschr. 2009 Oct;134(41):2078-83. (PMID: 19802771)

External Links for this article
(including full text providers, if available):

Click Electronic Full-text Provider Links to see options for finding the electronic full text links to this article. Note there may be a subscription or fee required for access to the full text. See our FAQ for information on finding FREE full text articles.

This article may also be located in paper journal collections available in many libraries. Use the Journal and Publication Information above to find the full article.

MeSH headings (categories)

This article was linked to the MESH Headings shown below.

These are the highest related articles currently in the database:

How to avoid the reviewer's axe: one editor's view. 30 Dec 2003
Response to Where did the scientific method go? 30 Dec 2007
Where did the scientific method go? 30 Dec 2007
Writing intelligible English prose for biomedical journals. 29 Apr 2007
How to write a medical paper to get it published in a good journal. 2 Nov 2005
"It's déjà vu all over again". 29 Nov 2003
[On rejection of papers submitted for publication.] 24 Jul 2005
[Not god enough, Ugeskriftet--and not satisfactory in these quality-conscious times] 30 Jun 2001
Quality articles require peer reviewers as well as authors. 27 Feb 2005
Kipling's guide to writing a scientific paper. 30 May 2002

See 100+ related articles.