|
|
| Research article summary (published 30 Oct 2009): |
Validity of electrical stimulus magnitude matching in chronic pain.
Full Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To examine the validity of the PainMatcher in chronic pain. DESIGN: Comparison of parallel pain estimates from visual analogue scales with electrical stimulus magnitude matching. PATIENTS: Thirty-one patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain. METHODS: Twice a day ongoing pain was rated on a standard 100-mm visual analogue scale, and thereafter magnitude matching was performed using a PainMatcher. The sensory threshold to electrical stimulation was tested twice on separate occasions. RESULTS: In 438 observations visual analogue scale ranged from 3 to 95 (median 41) mm, and PainMatcher magnitudes from 2.67 to 27.67 (median 6.67; mean 7.78) steps. There was little correlation between visual analogue scale and magnitude data (r = 0.29; p < 0.0001). The mean sensory threshold was 3.67 steps, indicating that the PainMatcher, on average, stimulated at 2.1 times the perception threshold at matching point. CONCLUSION: Electrical magnitude matching of chronic pain intensity elicited limited activation of nerve fibres at 2.0-2.2 times sensory threshold, indicating that the induced pain was evoked by coarse nociceptive Adelta fibres. While the visual analogue scale estimates covered the whole range of the instrument, the PainMatcher readings utilized only a small part of the instrument range and, importantly, had little or no relation to the visual analogue scale estimates. The validity of the PainMatcher procedure is doubtful.
Author information
Author/s: Persson, Ann L (AL); Westermark, Sofia (S); Merrick, Daniel (D); Sjölund, Bengt H (BH);
Affiliation: Rehabilitation and Research Centre for Torture Victims, Borgergade 13, PO 2107, DK-1014 Copenhagen K, Denmark. ap(-atsign-)rct.dk
Journal and publication information
Publication Type: Comparative Study; Journal Article; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Journal: Journal of rehabilitation medicine : official journal of the UEMS European Board of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine (J Rehabil Med), published in Sweden. (Language: eng)
Reference: 2009-Nov; vol 41 (issue 11) : pp 898-903
Dates: Created 2009/10/20; Completed 2009/10/23;
PMID: 19841841, status: MEDLINE (last retrieval date: 10/23/2009, IMS Date: )
Sourced from the National Library of Medicine. Abstract text and other information may be subject to copyright.
External Links for this article
(including full text providers, if available):
Click Electronic Full-text Provider Links to see options for finding the electronic full text links to this article. Note there may be a subscription or fee required for access to the full text. See our FAQ for information on finding FREE full text articles.
This article may also be located in paper journal collections available in many libraries. Use the Journal and Publication Information above to find the full article.
MeSH headings (categories)
This article was linked to the MESH Headings shown below.
Related articles
These are the highest related articles currently in the database:
- Clinical uses of TENS. A survey of physical therapists.
30 Dec 1979 - [TNS--transcutaneous nerve stimulation]
4 Jul 1988 - A survey of current phantom limb pain treatment in the United States.
30 Jan 1980 - Treatment options for regional musculoskeletal pain: what is the evidence?
30 May 1999 - [Surgery for pain and analgesic stimulation]
30 Mar 1979 - Nonpharmacological treatments for musculoskeletal pain.
27 Feb 2001 - Complications of dorsal column stimulation.
30 Dec 1977 - Treatment of the chronic pain patient.
30 Aug 1978 - The search for relief.
29 Jun 2008 - Spinal cord stimulation for relief of chronic pain in vasospastic disorders of the upper limbs.
30 Dec 1988
Related Article Map
Legend:
- FREE Full text Article.
- Abstract only.
- Title only. More help.
See a large map of 100+ related articles.