Assessment of drug state dimensionality via drug-drug training and stimulus generalization testing.

Full Abstract

A procedure for determining whether different drugs share a common stimulus dimension is described. This procedure uses the presence of post-discrimination generalization gradient asymmetry as an indication that the training stimuli lay along a common stimulus dimension. Separate groups of hungry pigeons were trained to discriminate a 15 mg/kg dose of phenobarbital which was associated with frequent food reinforcement (S+) from each of 9 different drug conditions which were associated with infrequent reinforcement (S-). S- stimuli were selected to represent a drug from a completely different class (amphetamine), a drug with biphasic effects which may partially correspond with the effects of phenobarbital (delta 9-THC), and a drug from the same class as the S+ (pentobarbital). Following discrimination training subjects were tested for generalization to five dosage levels (5, 10, 15, 20, 25 mg/kg) of phenobarbital. Steep symmetrical generalization gradients around the S+ indicated that delta 9-THC and d-1-amphetamine were both quite discriminable from phenobarbital, and that they were perceived by subjects as representing stimulus dimensions different from phenobarbital, and that it was perceived as lying on a stimulus dimension common to phenobarbital. This procedure may allow better understanding of how different drug states are perceived by animals as similar or dissimilar.

Author information

Author/s: Gouvier, W D (WD); Akins, F R (FR); Trapold, M A (MA);

Journal and publication information

Publication Type: Journal Article

Journal: Pharmacology, biochemistry, and behavior (Pharmacol Biochem Behav), published in UNITED STATES. (Language: eng)

Reference: 1984-Nov; vol 21 (issue 5) : pp 687-93

Dates: Created 1985/02/07; Completed 1985/02/07; Revised 2004/11/17;

PMID: 6096894, status: MEDLINE (last retrieval date: 2/18/2009, IMS Date: )

Sourced from the National Library of Medicine. Abstract text and other information may be subject to copyright.

External Links for this article
(including full text providers, if available):

Click Electronic Full-text Provider Links to see options for finding the electronic full text links to this article. Note there may be a subscription or fee required for access to the full text. See our FAQ for information on finding FREE full text articles.

This article may also be located in paper journal collections available in many libraries. Use the Journal and Publication Information above to find the full article.